🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “utter hypocrisy” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Documents seen by journalists dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests proposals to prohibit tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a pending law that include reductions in the suggested dimensions of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavored smoking items, and watered-down penalties for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“As an elected official, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” stated Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to WHO calculations.

Chimbala said the letter was known to have been circulated to various ministerial offices and was in distribution within civil society groups.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

The situation emerges alongside broader worries about industry interference with public health regulations. Recently, international health experts issued a warning that the tobacco industry was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“There is proof of business advocacy everywhere. Corporate signatures are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN high-level meeting,” commented Jorge Alday.

Possible outcomes

“When public health regulation isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in individuals' health who might potentially stop smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that pictorial cautions cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the corporation proposes this be lowered to thirty to fifty percent “following international guideline limits”, delayed for at least one year after the bill passes.

The WHO in fact recommends a warning should cover at least 50% of the front of a pack “and aim to cover as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. In the UK, warnings must cover 65% of a product container sides.

Scented product controversy

The company seeks the removal of broad restrictions on scented smoking items, arguing that it would push consumers toward “illicitly sold” products. The corporation recommends restricting fewer varieties of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The draft bill suggests penalties for various offences “varying from a fraction of annual sales to ten-year jail sentences”.

Business explanation

In the letter, the managing director of British American Tobacco Zambia claims the corporation is focused on responsible corporate conduct” and “backs the goals of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the related medical consequences” but asserts that “some regulations can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued BAT’s proposed changes would “weaken this legislation so much that the necessary effect for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that numerous similar measures were present in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “complete contradiction”, he stated.

“We live in a international community. When I cultivate smoking products in my property and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to enrich myself and all the future family lines while my neighbor's family are succumbing … is in itself total emotional bankruptcy.”

Public health laws in the UK or elsewhere had not resulted in corporate closures, the campaigner stated. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative stated: “BAT Zambia conducts its activities following with applicable local laws. Additionally, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the suitable systems which provide for stakeholder participation in policymaking.”

The firm positioned itself as “not against rules”, they said, noting that underage people should be protected from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We support evolving legislation to accomplish desired community wellbeing objectives, while recognizing the range of rights and obligations on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the spokesperson stated, mentioning that the company's suggestions “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and cigarette sector, which involves increasing amounts of black market activity”.

Zambia’s department of trade, commerce and industry was contacted for response.