🔗 Share this article

"Half of my experiences is stored on Snapchat, and now they expect us to fork out money for it."

Negative ratings and a perception of injustice have flooded online discussion since Snapchat joined the newest tech firm to put a price tag on a feature that individuals previously accessed for free.

The app's parent company announced in September that it would begin imposing fees subscribers if they have over five gigabytes worth of previously shared pictures and clips stored as Memories.

In the eyes of countless individuals, these past uploads serve as a portal to bygone days – driving some to criticize the firm of "money-hungry tactics" in comments on digital networks and poor reviews on Google and Apple's app stores.

Other Choices

Snap has equated its premium storage tiers to those made available by Apple and Google for mobile devices.

For those seeking another option for individuals avoiding fees, members have the ability to export their Memories – which for certain users span large volumes – to their device.

Snap stated that only a minority of subscribers would be impacted by the new policy.

The company admitted that it was "never easy to move from receiving a service for free to covering the expense" – but implied it would be "worth the cost" for users.

Many opposing the decision online appear unconvinced.

User Backlash

An online petition called the fee a "archival levy", with participants describing it "Orwellian" and "outrageous" – while one person threatened never to use the platform in the future.

In parallel, in a poor evaluation on the Google Play store, a individual identifying as an online commenter said it felt "very unethical".

"If I know millennials right, the majority have a long history of personal moments on Snapchat," they wrote. "The vast majority only kept the app mostly for that feature. Such limited storage is inadequate when you have years worth of moments... Farewell Snapchat."

Furthermore, a London-based user, a young adult aspiring reporter in the UK capital, posted on the video platform her decision to remove the app.

"I concluded that I needed to download all my archived media as soon as I could," she stated. "Almost all of my teenage years have been documented through my Snapchat memories, all of the pictures in there are really important to me."

"This seems illogical to start charging users for a feature that has been at no cost for so many years."

Unspecified Pricing

The company has not yet said how much subscription tiers would be priced at in the Britain – only that they are part of a "phased international launch".

Yet 23-year-old a different individual, who also lives in the city, commented in a upload on the video service that she would be "distraught" by such charges.

She explained that the app had become "a regular habit" since she first joined in the past.

Although she acknowledged she understood the service needed to earn income, the user suggested that the saved content option means more to users than the company may have anticipated.

"I think it's a rather unjust decision to demand payment from your subscribers who have been consistent and engaged," she explained. "These are not merely labeled 'Memories', these are our real-life recollections."

Expert Analysis

Firms opting to impose fees from customers for a function that was previously free is nothing new, and millions pay for platforms like digital backup services to backup their photos and videos from their handset.

The fact of keeping information in the digital storage – which some in the tech industry often describe as simply "somebody else's computer" – is that it requires funding.

"Managing trillions of Memories on Snapchat isn't a trivial amount," social media consultant Matt Navarra commented. "The platform has to try to find a approach to offset the expenses of storage, data transfer, back-ups, content delivery, encryption – everything involved."

But Mr Navarra indicated that imposing charges for a function that had previously been free, and users had been invited to access as such, may seem like a "bait and switch" for many people.

"Altering the terms after users have accumulated this massive online collection seems unfair," he explained. And for many, he continued, "Archived media exceeds mere information, they're personal mementos."

The opinion was reflected by those leaving critical reviews, with an individual labeling their Snapchat photos and videos "deeply important to me".

"These archives contain each part of my personal journey within them from joyful events like births, sad moments of loss, times spent with loved ones, [and] my complete adolescence," they commented.

Expert Analysis

A postdoctoral researcher, a postdoctoral researcher at a Dutch institution in the Holland, said that the company's action highlights the consequences of for-profit services being used to save emotional private media.

"Platforms gain from this trust, interdependence, and expectation of continuous entry, which even incentivises many people to stay on the service or persist with the feature in order to revisit their stored media," she explained to the BBC. "But these are not benevolent guardians of personal memory."